Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 05:59

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Swimmer's itch: What it is and how to treat it - kare11.com
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
SSRIs Restore Brain Function in Alzheimer’s - Neuroscience News
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What are the best children's books by age 13?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Safeway workers begin striking in 4 Colorado cities - 9News
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Fred Smith, FedEx’s billionaire founder and CEO, dies at 80 - The Washington Post
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Bowel Cancer in Young People Is Rising – Here's How to Reduce Your Risk - ScienceAlert
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.